Overview: Dave Grohl stars in horror-comedy ‘Studio 666’

Horror is so extremely popular now that everyone would really like a chunk. No for an extended time relegated to the midnight movement image, the often minimal-price vary, large-gain style isn’t just flourishing on the field office within the lingering pandemic market place, it’s nearly saturated it. So it’s no shock {that a} beloved rock band, particularly one explicit as affable because the Foo Fighters, might need in on the motion. What they’ve arrive up with is the goofy, gory horror-comedy “Studio 666.” .

The Foo Fighters have all the time been a band with character. The movies for “Everlong” and “Be taught to Fly” showcased the performing and comedy experience of frontman Grohl, drummer Taylor Hawkins and guitarist Pat Smear, or a minimum of their willingness to endeavor humor. That set them apart from the remainder of the fashionable day rock brigade. Rock legend Grohl has real star prime quality and is steadily showcased as a conversing head in rock documentaries, on social media and in Tv appearances. However as “Studio 666” proves, rock star enchantment and temperament don’t mechanically translate into the performing chops wished to have a side film.

With a extra highly effective screenplay and much more dynamic filmmaking, the novice performing wouldn’t be as painfully clear. However the Foos are trapped with a crass, crude, dated and terribly unfunny script revealed by Jeff Buhler and Rebecca Hughes from a story by Grohl, and McDonnell’s filmmaking is comparatively inert. Neither humorous nor horrifying, “Studio 666” is lacking in stress and suspense. Not even cameos from horror grasp John Carpenter or 2022’s newly minted Scream Queen Jenna Ortega (“Scream,” “X”) can provide real horror bona fides to this flick, and slapstick comedian Whitney Cummings can’t make this matter amusing.

The Foos carry out on their very own on this story of songwriter’s block and demonic possession. Beneath stress to offer a brand new album to their demanding supervisor (Jeff Garlin), they gap up in a rundown Encino mansion talked about to be haunted with the spirit of a ’90s band that by no means accomplished their album quickly after a single member went on a killing spree (seen in flashbacks). Dave, trying to find inspiration, stumbles on a brand new riff simply after encountering the demon within the basement. Homicide and mayhem ensue.

The total level feels as if it was a lark for Grohl, who will get the meatiest (actually) job, though the remainder of the band feels held hostage, standing near delivering flat response strains to their lead singer. The jokes are stale, the ability is stilted, and the complete issue seems like a misbegotten self-importance coaching cooked up within the pandemic to carry them occupied. It is usually about an hour and a fifty p.c far too intensive: Excise the corny dialogue and jumbled plot and slice alongside each other the kills, and “Studio 666” could be a enjoyment extended new music video, which is what it ought to have been within the very first space. However because it stands, the movie model is for die-difficult Foo lovers solely. Not even the blood-thirstiest horror hounds might be able to slake their thirst for gore with this a single.

Katie Walsh is a Tribune Info Supplier movie critic.

‘Studio 666’

Rating: R, for potent bloody violence and gore, pervasive language and sexual info

Functioning time: 1 hour, 46 minutes

Taking part in: In frequent launch Feb. 25

Related Articles

Back to top button